Search for: "CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2012, 1:27 pm by WIMS
"       The opinion addresses those challenges to the Project that petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife et al., and Summit Lake Paiute Tribe have raised under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:38 pm by Steve Davies
 This opinion addresses those challenges to the Project that petitioners Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife et al., and Summit Lake Paiute Tribe have raised under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:50 pm
United States Fish and Wildlife, et al., Case No. 08-CV-01490-AWI-GSA). [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 2:29 pm by editor@howarddc.com
  Atrazine, propazine, and simazine are all included in a stipulated settlement between the parties in Center for Biological Diversity et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:28 am
On October 5, 2005, the Forest Guardians, Center for Biological Diversity, and Save Our Springs Alliance filed suit against the Service for failure to designate critical habitat for this species (Forest Guardians et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
They then use those fees to fund even more lawsuits against the Fish and Wildlife Service, and occasionally even against the National Marine Fisheries Service, though NMFS was mentioned sparingly during the hearing. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by lburchi@lawbc.com
Circuit issued its opinion in Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), et al. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, (Mar. 20, 2013, Nos. 11-338 and 11-347) ___ U.S. ___, 2013 U.S. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
Dale Robertson, Civil No. 89-160 and Washington Contract Loggers Assoc. et al., v. [read post]
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]